HomeReliabilityLoad Testing
Load Testing

Performance Validation with k6

Validate system performance under high throughput. Test capacity limits, identify bottlenecks, and ensure your infrastructure can handle production load.

Live k6 Test Execution

RUNNING
Virtual Users
150
Requests/sec
1247
P95 Latency
23.4ms
P99 Latency
45.2ms
Error Rate
0.12%

Test Scenarios & Results

Virtual Users
500
Peak Concurrency
Throughput
2500
Requests per second
P95 Latency
24.3ms
95th percentile
Error Rate
0.08%
Failed requests

Why Load Testing Matters

Load testing simulates real-world traffic patterns to validate that your system can handle expected (and unexpected) demand. Without load testing, you're deploying blind—hoping your infrastructure will scale when it matters most.

I use k6, an open-source load testing tool built for modern, cloud-native systems. It supports:

Ramping Tests

Gradually increase load to find breaking points. Identify at what VU count latency degrades or errors spike.

Soak Tests

Run sustained load for extended periods. Catch memory leaks, connection pool exhaustion, and slow degradation over time.

Spike Tests

Sudden traffic bursts to test auto-scaling. Ensure your system recovers gracefully after load spikes.

Real Use Case: Text2SQL 500 Concurrent Queries/Sec Validation

How load testing revealed hidden bottlenecks in the AI query pipeline

Challenge: The Text2SQL Query Engine needed to handle 500 concurrent natural language queries with p95 latency under 800ms. Business dashboards refresh on a schedule, causing predictable traffic spikes.

Solution: Created k6 test scripts simulating diverse query patterns:

export default function() {
http.post(API_URL, JSON.stringify({ query: "Show sales by region last quarter" }));
}
// Threshold: p95 < 800ms, error rate < 0.5%

Discovery: At 350 concurrent users, p95 latency jumped from 620ms to 3.2 seconds. The culprit? LLM provider rate limiting combined with database connection pool saturation.

Fix: Implemented request queuing with exponential backoff for LLM calls and increased DB pool size from 25 to 100. Re-tested at 600 concurrent users—p95 stayed at 750ms.

Impact: Prevented timeouts during peak dashboard refresh periods. Load testing caught the cascading failures before going live.

How It Helps

📊

Capacity Planning

Know your system's limits before you hit them. Make data-driven scaling decisions based on actual performance curves.

🔍

Bottleneck Identification

Pinpoint exactly where performance degrades. Database queries? Thread pools? Network I/O? Load testing reveals the answer.

SLA Validation

Prove that your system meets latency and throughput SLAs under realistic load. Ship with confidence.